<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disability Tips &#187; Durational Requirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/tag/durational-requirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com</link>
	<description>Published by the Stasiuk Firm PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:27:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Experts at Social Security disability hearings</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2011/01/medical-experts-at-social-security-disability-hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2011/01/medical-experts-at-social-security-disability-hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Stasiuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3 Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durational Requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listings of Impairments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Expert (ME)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequential Evaluation Process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=3972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes when a Social Security disability case goes to hearing, the Administrative Law Judge has a brand new doctor testify (usually by telephone). This is not one of your doctors, or (usually) even one of the doctors Social Security has sent you to. These are Medical Experts (MEs) that the Judge calls for several reasons: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/iStock_000004133322XSmall.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3978" title="Justice and Healthcare" src="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/iStock_000004133322XSmall.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="282" /></a>Sometimes when a Social Security disability case goes to hearing, the Administrative Law Judge has a brand new doctor testify (usually by telephone). This is not one of your doctors, or (usually) even one of the doctors Social Security has sent you to. These are Medical Experts (MEs) that the Judge calls for several reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Establish a medically determinable impairment</strong>. In any Social Security disability case, you have to prove the existence of not only symptoms, but also an underlying cause &#8212; a diagnosis. When the records are not clear, or when different doctors have provided different diagnoses (especially over time), a Medical Expert can help clarify what the underlying conditions have been and are today.</li>
<li><strong>Determine if the impairments meet or equal a listing level impairment (step 3 in the <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/03/how-social-security-reviews-cases-the-5-step-sequential-evaluation-process/">Sequential Evaluation Process</a>).</strong> If a Medical Expert states your impairments either meet the requirements of  listing level impairment, or have the same limitations as a listing level impairment, the case may be approved very quickly.</li>
<li><strong>Provide limitations from the impairment(s).</strong> In many cases, treating doctors do not want to make any kind of opinion about work-place limitations. They refuse to complete forms which often results in a gap in your evidence. Even though Social Security often has one of their own doctors review a case and determine limitations during the initial case review (before the first decision), the Medical Expert can provide a <em>new</em> opinion. This can be a better opinion since it is based on evidence that has been developed over the course of the case.</li>
<li><strong>Establish an onset date.</strong> If the Medical Expert is supportive of the disability, they may also be asked to estimate how far back the limitations existed. This is important to establishing the correct <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/04/what-is-an-alleged-onset-date-aod/">onset date</a> in a case.</li>
<li><strong>Provide a prognosis</strong>. In order for a condition to be disabling it has to either be expected to result in death or be disabling for 12 months or longer. If a condition has not clearly been disabling for 12 months, a Medical Expert may be asked whether it is likely to continue until the <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/you-have-to-be-disabled-for-12-months-the-durational-requirement/">durational requirement</a> is met.</li>
</ol>
<p>While a Medical Expert may touch on any or all of these, the make or break issues are whether the impairments meet a listing, or if not, what limitations are expected to result from the impairments.</p>
<blockquote><p>Is having a Medical Expert good or bad?</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-3972"></span>Unfortunately,  you have no way of knowing until the ME testifies at the hearing. I have had cases where the ME is completely supportive of the disability and we are done and have an approval five minutes after the ME testifies. I have also had cases where the ME is completely unhelpful and the rest of the hearing is like trying to scale Mount Everest.  MEs make or break cases. When they are helpful, it is like the heavens part. When they are not, it is as if they threw and hand grenade into the room and then walked out.  Why do MEs have such a critical impact on Social Security hearings?</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Medical Expert testimony is often the last evidence the Judge receives</strong>. In trial presentation theory, there are the concepts of recency and primacy. This simply means that jurors, or in this case the Judge, is more likely to accept what is heard first or last. When a Medical Expert testifies at the hearing, that testimony has the benefit of recency.</li>
<li><strong>Medical Experts are perceived as independent.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Medical Experts provide live testimony.</strong> Unlike other doctors&#8217; reports and records in the file, the Medical Expert is providing live testimony and responding to the Judge&#8217;s questions. Combined with the other two factors, Medical Expert testimony is usually quite persuasive at hearings.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What to do about bad medical expert testimony:</h2>
<blockquote><p>So, is that it? If a Medical Expert testifies, is that the entire case?</p></blockquote>
<p>No. You have several options:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Object to the Medical Expert / object to certifying the witness as an expert. </strong>You can always object to a witness at the hearing. However, this cannot be done willy-nilly. There has to grounds for the objection, and the Judge may overrule the objection. Another risk is that you can only object to the ME <em>before</em> they testify. If you object, and the ME testimony was going to be good, you may be loosing the best evidence you could possibly get.</li>
<li><strong>Have your own doctor testify at your Social Security disability hearing</strong>. This is one of those things that sounds perfectly reasonable and yet, rarely happens. I have had a number of clients tell me that their doctor testify. However, when the hearing date is set and the doctor is notified, it turns out they will not attend. I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen a treating provider actually come in to testify. Keep in mind that even if a doctor <em>is</em> willing to testify, you may have to pay from two hours to half a day for the doctor&#8217;s time &#8212; even if they only testify for 20 minutes. This can easily cost several thousand dollars.</li>
<li><strong>Submit a post hearing rebuttal opinion.</strong> Some Judges will allow you to provide a written report from your doctor addressing the Medical Expert&#8217;s testimony. Even doctors who were previously unwilling to get involved are sometimes spurred to take action by the Medical Expert&#8217;s testimony. A rebuttal report may be free, or may cost several hundred dollars.</li>
<li><strong>Put on the best damn case you have. </strong>Even if the Medical Expert is not helpful, all you can do is present the case you have prepared. Remember that the Medical Expert has <em>never</em> examined you and does not <em>know</em> you as well as your own doctors. Social Security has to give consideration to the length, extent, and nature of treating relationship between you and your doctors.</li>
</ol>
<p>Even if the Medical Expert is not helpful, there is often evidence in the file that supports your disability. You just have to fight extra hard to bring it to the Judge&#8217;s attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2011/01/medical-experts-at-social-security-disability-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You have to be disabled for 12 months &#8211; the Durational Requirement</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/you-have-to-be-disabled-for-12-months-the-durational-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/you-have-to-be-disabled-for-12-months-the-durational-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Stasiuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durational Requirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=2391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever seen this in a Social Security denial? While your condition may prevent you from working at the present, we do not feel that your condition will remain disabling for 12 months. [Claim denied] First, Social Security says that you are disabled. Then, they deny the claim. What is going on? To qualify [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2392" title="1 year calendar" src="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/istock_000007201810xsmall.jpg" alt="1 year calendar" width="347" height="346" /></p>
<p>Have you ever seen this in a Social Security denial?</p>
<blockquote><p>While your condition may prevent you from working at the present, we do not feel that your condition will remain disabling for 12 months.</p>
<p>[Claim denied]</p></blockquote>
<p>First, Social Security says that you are disabled. Then, they deny the claim. What is going on?<span id="more-2391"></span></p>
<p>To qualify for Social Security disability benefits, you have to be <a title="Am I disabled" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2008/08/am-i-disabled/">disabled</a>. However, that is only part of the analysis.  Social Security also requires that your disability be expected to last for at least 12 months.</p>
<p>This is called the <strong>durational requirement</strong>. If your disability is not <em>expected to</em> last for 12 months, or does not <em>actually</em> last for 12 months (or longer), Social Security will deny the claim.</p>
<p>I see often this in car accident or back injury cases. Social Security agrees that you are disabled <em>right now</em>. However, they deny the case because they do not think you will be disabled for 12 months.</p>
<blockquote><p>What can I do about it?</p></blockquote>
<p>As you already know, most Social Security cases takes over a year from beginning to end (with many taking more than two years). So, in many cases the durational requirement is met by the time the case goes to hearing because 12 months have passed since the start of the disability.</p>
<p>At that point, it is no longer a matter of <em>predicting</em> whether you will still be disabled for 12 months, but only question of whether you <em>actually have been</em> disabled for 12 months.</p>
<blockquote><p>So I HAVE TO wait for 12 months to be found disabled?</p></blockquote>
<p>Not necessarily. You can be found disabled if your condition is <em>expected</em> to last for 12 months or longer.  If you can get a prognosis, a medical statement, that your condition is disabling and that it is expected to last for at least 12 months, you can be found disabled without waiting out the 12 month durational period.</p>
<p>Also check out how the durational requirement fits in the <a title="How Social Security reviews cases: the 5 step sequential evaluation process" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/03/how-social-security-reviews-cases-the-5-step-sequential-evaluation-process/">5 step process Social Security uses to review cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/you-have-to-be-disabled-for-12-months-the-durational-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Social Security reviews cases: the 5 step sequential evaluation process</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/03/how-social-security-reviews-cases-the-5-step-sequential-evaluation-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/03/how-social-security-reviews-cases-the-5-step-sequential-evaluation-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Stasiuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durational Requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRWE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prior Relevant Work (PRW)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequential Evaluation Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work | Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written about how Social Security defines disability, work, and a substantial gainful activity. But, how does Social Security really evaluate a case? Social Security reviews cases using the five-step sequential evaluation process to decide is a person is disabled.  Here are the 5 questions that make up the sequential evaluation process: Does your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2064" title="How Social Security decides cases" src="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/istock_000004996421xsmall.jpg" alt="How Social Security decides cases" width="400" height="300" /></p>
<p>I have written about how Social Security defines <a title="What is Disability" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2007/12/social-security-basics-what-is-disability/">disability</a>, <a title="How Does SSA View Work" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2007/12/social-security-basics-what-work-is-a-substantial-gainful-activity/">work</a>, and a <a title="Is All Work a Substantial Gainful Activity?" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2007/12/useful-site-social-security-substantial-gainful-activity-amounts-by-year/">substantial gainful activity</a>.</p>
<p>But, how does Social Security <strong>really</strong> evaluate a case?</p>
<p>Social Security reviews cases using the <strong>five-step sequential evaluation process </strong>to decide is a person is disabled.  Here are the 5 questions that make up the sequential evaluation process:</p>
<ol>
<li>Does your impairment keep you from being able to perform a <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2007/12/useful-site-social-security-substantial-gainful-activity-amounts-by-year/">substantial gainful activity (SGA)</a>, generally full-time, competitive, work?</li>
<li>Is your impairment severe?  AND, is your impairment expected to remain severe for at least 12 months?</li>
<li>Does your impairment &#8220;meet or equal&#8221; one of Social Security&#8217;s &#8220;Listing of Impairments?&#8221; A listing of medical conditions, acceptable medical evidence, and the severity necessary for an impairment to be considered disabling.  There are separate listings for <a title="Social Security Listings of Impairments - Adults" href="http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/AdultListings.htm">adults</a> and for <a title="Social Security Listings of Impairments - Adults" href="http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/ChildhoodListings.htm">children</a>.</li>
<li>Does your impairment prevents you from being able to perform any job you performed over the last 15 years which was also a substantial gainful activity?</li>
<li>Does your impairment prevent you from being able to perform any other type of work which exists in substantial numbers of the national economy?</li>
</ol>
<p>Let&#8217;s take these one at a time:<span id="more-876"></span></p>
<h3>Step 1: Engaging in a Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA)</h3>
<p>A.k.a.: Are you working?</p>
<p>Even you have a clearly disabling condition, if you are able to work at a <a title="Is all work a substantial gainful activity?" href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2007/12/useful-site-social-security-substantial-gainful-activity-amounts-by-year/">substantial gainful activity level (SGA)</a>, you are <em>not disabled</em>.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Example, you may be limited to crutches or a wheelchair, but you force yourself to work a full time, competitive, job.  Under Social Security regulations, you are not considered disabled.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Because you are able to work, you do not qualify for Social Security disability benefits.</p>
<p>There are <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/07/i-earn-too-much-for-social-security-what-can-i-do/">exceptions</a> to this:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you are working full time, but your medical expense, which let you work, are so high that your pre-tax income is still below SGA threshold, then your <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/10/more-information-about-impairment-related-work-expenses-irwes/">Impairment Related Work Expenses (IRWEs)</a> make your work not SGA.  So, you case should not be denied at step 1.</li>
<li>If you are working at an SGA level, but the work is not competitive: you either got a job through a friend or family member and you not held to the same standards as another worker in the same position, or if you are being paid a &#8220;<a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/06/is-sheltered-work-or-subsidized-work-a-substantial-gainful-activity-sga/">subsidy</a>&#8221; &#8212; the value of your work is $600 a week, but you are being paid $800 a week.</li>
</ul>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 24px;">This is only a summary, check out this post for <a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/07/i-earn-too-much-for-social-security-what-can-i-do/">more exceptions</a>. </span></span></div>
<h3>Step 2: Severity</h3>
<p>For an impairment to be severe, it has to cause more than a minimal effect on your ability to perform daily activities?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Example: many people have asthma.  However, asthma is not always disabling. Asthma is often well controlled with medications. When it is not well controlled, it may be a severe impairment.</p>
<p>As a Colorado lawyer, I do not see Social Security deny a lot of cases because they do not believe a impairment is severe.  However, every once in a while, this comes up.  Having a &#8220;severe&#8221; condition is a pretty low standard and it is usually fairly easy to show that a condition has more than a minimal effect on daily activities.</p>
<p>The second part of this is more difficult.  The condition has to be expected to <em>remain severe for 12 months or longer</em>.</p>
<p>If you are denied because Social Security does not think your condition will be disabling for 12 months, it is called a &#8220;durational denial.&#8221;</p>
<p>I often see a durational denial, where there has been a traumatic accident (such as a car accident) or in cases of disability during the recovery period following serious surgery (such as a back fusion).</p>
<p>Social Security accepts that there will be a healing period where you may not be able to work.  But, unless you can convince Social Security that your condition will remain disabling for 12 months, you may be denied.</p>
<h3>Step 3: Listing Level Impairment</h3>
<p>This is the &#8220;short-cut&#8221; step.  If you have a condition which is contained in the <a title="Social Security listing of impairments" href="http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/AdultListings.htm">Social Security Listing of Impairments</a> AND the medical findings match what is required for your listing, you may be found disabled without Social Security considering the last two steps.  This is &#8220;meeting a listing.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can also be found disabled at this step if your condition &#8220;equals a listing.&#8221; Equaling a listing means that while your condition may not be mentioned in the Listing of Impairments, it is just a severe AND has the same findings as a listed impairment.</p>
<p>In my experience with individuals who have already been denied once, the chance of meeting or equaling a listing level impairment is small.  But, it is always worth considering.</p>
<h3>Step 4: Ability to Perform Prior Work</h3>
<p>If you are able to perform any of the past work you have done at a substantial gainful activity level, over the last 15 years before your disability began, Social Security can deny you.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Example: If you previously performed very physical work (construction work or nursing), but you also did worked as a manager for a few months, you may be denied based on your ability to still be able to perform the management job.  This may apply even though it is not your most recent work, the employer is no longer in business, or if you cannot get hired for that type of work any more.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that this is just a general overview.  Every case depends on its specific circumstances. Also, there are a number of issues around this step including whether you worked long enough to learn the job.</p>
<h3>Step 5: Ability to Perform Other Work</h3>
<p>Even if you are unable to perform any of your past jobs, you can still be denied if there are <em>other jobs</em> you can still perform which exist in substantial numbers in the national economy.</p>
<p>This is a very complicated area where many cases are <em>won or lost</em>.   The rules at this step change depending on your age group (18-49, 50-54, and 55-60).</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/09/getting-social-security-disability-benefits-before-you-turn-50/">If you are under 50</a>, the rule of thumb is that you have to prove that there is no work in the national economy that you can still perform.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2011/10/social-security-disability-benefits-after-age-50/">If you are over 50 years old, the rules get a bit easier</a>, but you still have to eliminate most kinds of jobs to win your case.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is just a quick rundown of the five-step sequential evaluation process. There are exceptions and corollaries to this but I just want to quickly state the steps that Social Security goes through in evaluating a disability claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/03/how-social-security-reviews-cases-the-5-step-sequential-evaluation-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1328960049.264 seconds -->

