<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers&#8217; secret gold-mine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/</link>
	<description>Published by the Stasiuk Firm PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomaszStasiuk</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>TomaszStasiuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=2372#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. However, I don&#039;t think the onus should be on clients to rebel. Lawyers already get a bad rap. Nickel and diming clients (especially when those charges add up) leave a bad taste to clients who are already footing the bill for professional services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. However, I don&#8217;t think the onus should be on clients to rebel. Lawyers already get a bad rap. Nickel and diming clients (especially when those charges add up) leave a bad taste to clients who are already footing the bill for professional services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=2372#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>Well, here&#039;s the thing - law firms had to provide these services in the old days.  Clients, therefore, had to pay for them.  Now that it&#039;s all been reduced to bits and bytes the need for those charges has been obviated but law firms realize that if they ditch the copier then a profit center goes out as well.  They need those nickels and dimes to keep profit on top of their administrative bloat.

As clients begin to rebel, law firms will be forced to evolve or die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; law firms had to provide these services in the old days.  Clients, therefore, had to pay for them.  Now that it&#8217;s all been reduced to bits and bytes the need for those charges has been obviated but law firms realize that if they ditch the copier then a profit center goes out as well.  They need those nickels and dimes to keep profit on top of their administrative bloat.</p>
<p>As clients begin to rebel, law firms will be forced to evolve or die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankharrison</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>frankharrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=2372#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>I was charged 25 cents for a paper clip by a Calif. attorney.  Needless to say, I did not pay it.  The attorney lost the postage on 3 mailings before it was stopped.  I was hoping that he would take me to court so that it would come out into the open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frank H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was charged 25 cents for a paper clip by a Calif. attorney.  Needless to say, I did not pay it.  The attorney lost the postage on 3 mailings before it was stopped.  I was hoping that he would take me to court so that it would come out into the open.</p>
<p>Frank H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankharrison</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/2009/05/lawyers-secret-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>frankharrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsecurityinsider.com/?p=2372#comment-959</guid>
		<description>I was charged 25 cents for a paper clip by a Calif. attorney.  Needless to say, I did not pay it.  The attorney lost the postage on 3 mailings before it was stopped.  I was hoping that he would take me to court so that it would come out into the open.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Frank H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was charged 25 cents for a paper clip by a Calif. attorney.  Needless to say, I did not pay it.  The attorney lost the postage on 3 mailings before it was stopped.  I was hoping that he would take me to court so that it would come out into the open.</p>
<p>Frank H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1329007057.981 seconds -->

